1 |
Exploring the interactive and linguistic dimensions of parent input and their role in the development of children's simple sentences.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Exploring Sentence Diversity at the Boundary of Typical and Impaired Language Abilities
|
|
|
|
In: J Speech Lang Hear Res (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Grammatical input differences remain six-months following toy talk instruction
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Uniformity of pronoun case errors in typical development: the association between children's first person and third person case errors in a longitudinal study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Child-adult differences in implicit and explicit second language learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
The Sentence Diversity Checklist: Characterizing Early Syntactic Development Using Parent Report
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Parent-Examiner Differences in their use of Toy Talk and its Influence on Input Informativeness
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Toy talk: A simple strategy to promote richer grammatical input
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Understanding Contributors to Input Informativeness for Tense Marking: Overlap among English Typology, Parent-Toddler Interaction Style, and Register
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Use of family history information in school-based prevention practice
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Social biases toward children with speech and language impairments: A correlative causal model of language limitations
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This study explores adults' attitudes toward children with limited linguistic competency. Four groups of adult judges participated in this study: kindergarten teachers, women matched for age and education level with the teachers, undergraduate college students, and speech-language pathologists. The judges listened to audiotaped samples of preschool children's speech. Two triads of children were formed, matched for age, gender, and intelligence, but differing in communication abilities. The adults responded to questionnaire items addressing child attributes (e.g., intelligence, social maturity) and parental attributes (e.g., education level, SES). Systematic biases were revealed toward children with limited communication abilities. The biases are interpreted as reflective of adults' expectations for children's language. It is argued that adults call upon a correlative causal model of language acquisition to interpret individual differences in children's language abilities. Negative social and academic consequences of such misinterpretations are discussed.
|
|
Keyword:
Communication; Impaired children
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1808/836
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|